why i believe in Christianity
evolution vs creationism
for many years people have wondered why animals have traits that make it easier to survive in there environment for
example the owl roams at night so to see it has night vision. jungle
creatures are cameo because the live in the forest and needs to hide.
carnivorous have big teeth because they hunt and need to eat flesh.
herbivores have small teeth because they only eat plants. the beaver has
massive teeth because it needs to chew through trees to so they can get
wood for there dams. humans that live in deserts like Africa
Afghanistan and places that are hot are black so they do not get sun
burn as easily meanwhile white people live in colder climates like
Europe china Asia japan they are white because they do not need
protection from sun because they live in colder climate.
examples of what me as a christian believes happened and what an evolutionist believes. which is more logical
owl and night vision
evolution says the owl roams at night so over millions of years it evolved and gained night vision so that it can see better at night
https://www.owlpages.com/owls/articles.php?a=5 christian sayis
it not more likely that the owl has night vision because god created it
to roam at night so he designed the owl with night vision
the owl having night vision because it lives during the night is proof of intelligent design not evolution. because the creator weather you believe that's chemicals or god would have to know that the owl lives at night in order to give it night vision. chemicals can not create something to complement another thing. you have to be intelligent to do that.
meat eaters
evolution sayspredators
like t Rex saber tooth tigers bears wolfs have really big teeth
evolution say that these creatures needed to to hunt and attack other
animals so over millions of years they got some really big teeth by
adapting to there nature and evolving.
christian saysis it not more likely that god designed these animals to hunt and kill so to do so he designed them with really big teeth
how would you chemicals that you believe created the universe know that big teeth would be better for hunting
plant eaters
evolution saysplant
eaters like the zebras deer giraffe horses have really small teeth
because they do not need to hunt because they eat plants herbs evolution
says this is because they over millions of years adapted to there
environment
christian saysis it not more likely that that these herbivores have small teeth because god designed them to eat only plants.
how would your chemicals that you believe created the universe know that small teeth would be best suited for those who eat plants.
deer teeth
evolution says
that the lizard develop a
defense mechanism were if an animal like a bird grabs him by the tail
and trys to eat him it can make his tail fall off so it can get away and
later grows it back
christian says
is it not more likely that god designed the lizard with a tail that falls off it if it grabbed so that it can get away
how would you chemicals that created the universe know that the lizard would be grabbed by the tail. and then create it so ts tail falls off
people
black
skin people live easier to heat while white skin people have hard time
in the heat and live in cooler places. evolution says they changed skin
color by adapting to there surrounding while i as a christian say god
designed them with there skin color according to were he stuck them
after the tower of babble
https://health.howstuffworks.com/skin-care/beauty/sun-care/sun-affect-dark-complexions.htm
beavers
evolution says
beavers
have really big teeth beavers need to chomp on trees to build dams
evolution says over millions of years the beavers grew big teeth so that
they can chew down trees.
christian saysis it not more likely that god designed the beaver with large teeth so that it can chew down trees
how did your chemicals that you believe created the universe know that the beaver would need big teeth then design him with big teeth
clownfish
evolution says
the
clown fish lives in a anemone. its predator get stung by the anemone
when they try to get the clown fish. evolutionist say that the clown
fish evolved and developed a mutation that allows it to not get stung by
the anemone.
is it not more likely that god created the clown fish to live in the anemone so that it can hide from its predators
evolution says
that the angler fish grew a light bulb because it lived deep in the
ocean were you cannot see so over millions of years it grew a light
bulb. because it needed to see and needed a way to lure fish
christian say
is it not more likely that god created it with a light bulb so that it see in the deep ocean were there is no light
it took took Tomas Edison 1000 try to invent the light bulb he could not have done so if he did not have the ability to think and was just a bunch of chemicals floating in the air.
so why do you believe a bunch of chemicals invented the angler fish.
evolution says
chipmunks
have balloons for mouths that they use to carry nuts. evolution says
that over millions of years the chipmunks mouths turned relastic because
it could only carry a single nut with its paws and needed a better way
to carry nuts so over millions of years it adapted to the nature and
grew balloon cheeks
christian sayis it not more realistic to say that god designed the chipmunk with elastic cheeks so it can carry more nuts
how does your chemicals know that elastic cheeks would be a good way to hold nuts and that the chipmunk eats nuts and need expendable cheeks
kangaroos have these little pouches that they keep there babies in.
without these pouches the babies would probably be eaten by other
animals the babies kangaroo can not hop that fast let alone walk so if
it had to follow its mom. the mom would be miles ahead of the joey and
would technically abandon it. this is if they did not have a pouch. but
god must have known this so he gave them a little pouch to hold there
babies in. this is intelligence design. if the creator was a bunch of
chemicals how would you make the case that the kangaroo pouch was
designed for the babies kangaroo. since chemicals can not design
something to complement another thing because they can not think that
like saying my stuff animal dragon did it.
what makes jeans intelligent created but not the kangaroo
the kangaroo having a belly pouch to hold a joey is intelligent created by god
my jeans having pockets to fit a pen is intelligent created by humans at jean factory
god designed the belly pouch on the kangaroo so that it can hold babies
the jeans company designed my pants with pocket so that i can put a pen in there.
again how would your chemicals be aware and know that a kangaroo
would need a pouch to carry its babies. i can see a human putting
pockets in pants so that you can carry thing is that not the same thing
here but with god and a kangaroo.
the people who created the movie genesis is history make a good point
dna has a a repairing system that helps prevent mutations
so it would be impossible for animals or humans to change over time like Charles Darwin described
a monkey turning into a human is like saying a turtle turning into a humanoid turtle that talks and knows kungfu
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
everything is created intelegently by a god
  Considerate: 89%  
  Substantial: 26%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.12  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: god George Burns    title role   movie OH GOD.He   problem  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
everything is created intelegently by a god convince me otherwise
My reply .......well obviously he neglected to include you in his grand plan as you cannot even spell the word intelligently .......
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 60%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.34  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: grand plan    otherwiseMy reply   word   god  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 94%  
  Substantial: 27%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.22  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: thanks    spelling error      
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 14%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 73%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 3.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: sears    movie      
  Relevant (Beta): 78%  
  Learn More About Debra
https://www.artofmanliness.com/articles/a-mans-pockets/
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 83%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.7  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 6%  
  Learn More About Debra
Regarding the question of how the nature knew to evolve the teeth, for example - it was not a spontaneous occasion. It was developing very gradually. Due to random mutations, a significant minority of animals would develop some tiny sharp edges below their eyes. Those edges turned out very advantageous in survival and hunting, so the animals having them lived for longer and bred more than other animals. As that happened, eventually the entire species would have those edges. And the genes would multiply exponentially, so to speak, so those edges would slowly grow into efficient sharp teeth.
Yet that was only one of the possible effective evolution modes. Other animals, rather than developing sharp teeth, developed natural armor to defend from those teeth. Other animals still developed agility and speed to better run away from the animals with sharp teeth.
This is how natural selection works: more advantageous traits remain and persist, while less advantageous ones are lost in the competition for survival. It can take hundreds millions years for certain traits to fully blossom; there are no miracles in nature, and these processes take enormous amounts of time.
  Considerate: 83%  
  Substantial: 99%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 99%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.62  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
I couldn’t resist and it was a bit cruel so apologies, it’s all good.
I keep telling Christians Evolution is fact and accepted as such by most except the religious. If Evolution were somehow proved to be wrong it still does not make a case for a creator god.
You give a link a site that promotes bible study as an argument? This site is a supporter of nonsense as in I D which is pseudoscience, it’s remarkable the amount of Christians who call Evolution unscientific and yet put forward nonsense as in I D as a challenge.
As a Christian you assume your Christian god is the designer if that’s the case how did you rule out other possible gods as the designer?
When you have a peer reviewed paper disproving Evolution that’s when people will listen until then you have nothing only your opinion based on nonsense
You state.........a monkey turning into a human is like saying a turtle turning into a humanoid turtle that talks and knows kungfu
My reply .....Don’t say it then as it demonstrates why you shouldn’t listen to a preacher talk about Evolution go to a science class instead.
Humans did not evolve from monkeys. Humans are more closely related to modern apes than to monkeys, but we didn't evolve from apes, either. Humans share a common ancestor with modern African apes, like gorillas and chimpanzees. Scientists believe this common ancestor existed
5 to 8 million years ago. Shortly thereafter, the species diverged into two separate lineages. One of these lineages ultimately evolved into gorillas and chimps, and the other evolved into early human ancestors called hominids.
  Considerate: 62%  
  Substantial: 78%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.12  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 25%  
  Learn More About Debra
I would also like to address someone's remark about George Burns (My favorite God). When he said "I made the pits too big". What would he have said about his "creation" Dolly Parton????????
  Considerate: 84%  
  Substantial: 41%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 80%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.2  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 64%  
  Learn More About Debra
this is the definition of intelligence
The ability to acquire and apply knowledge and skills.
‘an eminent man of great intelligence’
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/intelligence
lets start with an easy one to understand the night owl and night vision on how it shows intelegence by apply knowledge
in order for the creator to create the owl it would require intelligence. the creator would have to have knowledge that the owl would live at night and it is dark and hard to see so he applied that knowledge and gave the owl night vision
https://www.owlpages.com/owls/articles.php?a=5
the creator must have had knowledge that night time is dark and you can not see well during the night so he applied this knowledge and gave the bat echo location so it can roam at night easier and made it black so that it can hide better
CYDHarta has pointed out that jeans did not originally have pockets. this is true but i was thinking about when i said that about the pants i have on right now. plus the first pants were leaves. i was comparing jeans with pocket to kangaroos to pouches.
but the same thing here. the creator must have had knowledge that the kangaroo joey would have trouble following its mom so he applied that knowledge and gave the kangaroo a pouch to hold the joey
When you have a peer reviewed paper disproving Evolution that’s when people will listen until then you have nothing only your opinion based on nonsense
You state.........a monkey turning into a human is like saying a turtle turning into a humanoid turtle that talks and knows kungfu
My reply .....Don’t say it then as it demonstrates why you shouldn’t listen to a preacher talk about Evolution go to a science class instead.
Humans did not evolve from monkeys. Humans are more closely related to modern apes than to monkeys, but we didn't evolve from apes, either. Humans share a common ancestor with modern African apes, like gorillas and chimpanzees. Scientists believe this common ancestor existed
5 to 8 million years ago. Shortly thereafter, the species diverged into two separate lineages. One of these lineages ultimately evolved into gorillas and chimps, and the other evolved into early human ancestors called hominids.
I keep telling Christians Evolution is fact and accepted as such by most except the religious. If Evolution were somehow proved to be wrong it still does not make a case for a creator god.
You give a link a site that promotes bible study as an argument? This site is a supporter of nonsense as in I D which is pseudoscience, it’s remarkable the amount of Christians who call Evolution unscientific and yet put forward nonsense as in I D as a challenge.
well its your opinion that a bible study site is unreliable.
MayCaesar said
Yet that was only one of the possible effective evolution modes. Other animals, rather than developing sharp teeth, developed natural armor to defend from those teeth. Other animals still developed agility and speed to better run away from the animals with sharp teeth.
This is how natural selection works: more advantageous traits remain and persist, while less advantageous ones are lost in the competition for survival. It can take hundreds millions years for certain traits to fully blossom; there are no miracles in nature, and these processes take enormous amounts of time
  Considerate: 68%  
  Substantial: 89%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.78  
  Sources: 18  
  Relevant (Beta): 14%  
  Learn More About Debra
Your evidence ......
java man fraud
https://evolutionisntscience.wordpress.com/evolution-frauds/
My reply ....... This has been debunked so many times even creationists rarely use it anymore ......http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/a_java.html
Your evidence .....
Lucy fraud
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/1651429/posts
My reply .....Again more creationist nonsense here is a video destroying this claim but I bet you won’t watch it as the truth seems to really upset you guys .....https://youtu.be/Fw_FRgn4j-
You say ......the other gods are demons who disobeyed the lord and in defiance set themselves up as gods to man and force men to worship them.
My reply ....Prove there are other gods and demons and then prove they disobeyed your god?
You say ......the biggest one being Islam and the Jehovah witness Mormons black Hebrew Israelite Buddhism
https://telltheworldtheword.wordpress.com/2012/05/03/the-angel-gabriel-sure-does-seem-to-start-a-lot-of-different-religions/
My reply ......Wow! It’s amazing how one religion hates the other and of course tell each other they are the wrong
You say .....well its your opinion that a bible study site is unreliable.
My reply .....Fortunately it’s also the opinion of scientists and rationalists , there is not one piece of valuable information in the entire Bible I can think off that’s in anyway useful to mankind
  Considerate: 33%  
  Substantial: 79%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.04  
  Sources: 10  
  Relevant (Beta): 48%  
  Learn More About Debra
That said, there are countless extinct animals we have discovered that had very small teeth. We ourselves, humans, have pretty small teeth, compared to most other carnivorous/omnivorous animals. It is not a stretch to assume that among our ancestors could very well be that extinct species, and we share it with tigers as an ancestor.
It is hard to read your writings because you barely use any grammar and punctuation, but you seem to have claimed that animals do not have any nutrition issues? How come? Getting enough nutrition of all the necessary kinds is pretty much the biggest struggle in the life of every animal, and a lot of animals lose that struggle and die to starvation at some point of their lives. Humans are the only species advanced enough to have harnessed nutrition and, for the most part, eliminated deaths to starvation.
"God" did not intend you to eat plants and meat plus bread that you eat now. The meat you eat nowadays is strongly processed, very different from what your distant ancestors ate. Bread is a human invention entirely, it did not even exist a few millennia ago. As for plants, almost all plants you eat nowadays are cultivated by countless generations of humans; you do not want to eat, say, wild bananas that did not participate in that cultivation, as you are likely to experience extreme food poisoning if you do.
If the "god" planned our nutrition, then he seriously messed up at some point, because almost everything he created seems to be completely inedible.
  Considerate: 82%  
  Substantial: 98%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.12  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 91%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 82%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.7  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 6%  
  Learn More About Debra
http://www.christianevidence.net/2017/11/evolution-frauds-top-10.html
god exist
You say ......the other gods are demons who disobeyed the lord and in defiance set themselves up as gods to man and force men to worship them.
satan makes people rich than haunts
dee said
My reply .....Fortunately it’s also the opinion of scientists and rationalists , there is not one piece of valuable information in the entire Bible I can think off that’s in anyway useful to mankind
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges+13&version=NIV
"Then the woman went to her husband and told him, “A man of God came to me. He looked like an angel of God, very awesome. I didn’t ask him where he came from, and he didn’t tell me his name. 7 But he said to me, ‘You will become pregnant and have a son. Now then, drink no wine or other fermented drink and do not eat anything unclean, because the boy will be a Nazirite of God from the womb "
alright so when the angel told samson mother that she was going to be pregnant with him. she said do not drink any wine or strong drinks it was the 1970s when we found out that that drinking while pregnant was bad
fully recognized. Work to educate pregnant women of the dangers of
alcohol in pregnancy"
– whisky for colds or laryngitis, hot brandy punch for cholera,
rum-soaked cherries for a cold. Doctors prescribed champagne as a
treatment for morning sickness. Pregnant women in labor would take a
shot or two of liquor to ease their discomfort. Wine was often
recommended during pregnancy to help pregnant women relax.
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges+13&version=NIV
"Then the woman went to her husband and told him, “A man of God came to me. He looked like an angel of God, very awesome. I didn’t ask him where he came from, and he didn’t tell me his name. 7 But he said to me, ‘You will become pregnant and have a son. Now then, drink no wine or other fermented drink and do not eat anything unclean, because the boy will be a Nazirite of God from the womb "
alright so when the angel told Samson mother that she was going to be pregnant with him. she said do not drink any wine or strong drinks it was the 1970s when we found out that that drinking while pregnant was bad
fully recognized. Work to educate pregnant women of the dangers of
alcohol in pregnancy"
– whisky for colds or laryngitis, hot brandy punch for cholera,
rum-soaked cherries for a cold. Doctors prescribed champagne as a
treatment for morning sickness. Pregnant women in labor would take a
shot or two of liquor to ease their discomfort. Wine was often
recommended during pregnancy to help pregnant women relax.
  Considerate: 66%  
  Substantial: 75%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.84  
  Sources: 21  
  Relevant (Beta): 6%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 41%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 83%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 2.78  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 85%  
  Learn More About Debra
My reply to your claims...........
The fallacy of those using Piltdown Man to disprove evolution can be summed up thusly:
Number 2.......
Did Ernst Haeckel admit that the embryo illustrations submitted as evidence of evolution were hoaxes?
Although some were said to be fabricated, they were fabricated only in the sense that they were reconstructed from partial data; see the Wikipedia entry for further information. But otherwise, see above that individual forgeries and hoaxes have no bearing on the validity of evolution as a theory, and that creationists are fooling no one by repeatedly concentrating selectively on them.
Number 3.....
Is it true that the fossil known as Lucy belonged to an extinct type of ape and has been removed from the fictitious tree of human evolution?
Regarding Lucy , the video you failed to comprehend and you send me on two links to biblical sites as “evidence “ come on!
Lucy is classed as Australopithecus afarensis, a common ancestor of both the Australopithecus and Homo genera. No major renaming or reassignment of Lucy ever occurred; however, some evidence suggests that Australopithecus afarensis may not have been direct ancestor to humans, but a very close relative of a direct ancestor. Au. afarensis is best known for its relatively small brain size, suggesting that upright walking—rather than increase in brain volume—occurred first in human evolution. Plenty of other fossil examples of Au. afarensis are known; Lucy just happens to be one of the most famous, so what is known of this species doesn't hinge on a single fossil.
Again, though, the question appears to be clawing at the fact that science "changes its mind". It does. It changes to be closer to reality. Evidence suggests that Au. afarensis might not be a direct modern human ancestor, but this just allows us to refine the model of human ancestry. The simple fact is that science is not dogma, and part of its function is to change to accommodate facts—if it did not do so it would be more like religion—and almost useless, since (like anything else) it can't improve if it doesn't change, and science is all about improving our understanding of the world
Even if Evolution was somehow demonstrated to be false it still does not prove a god exists something so far you’ve produced zero evidence for
You say ...
alright you got me here but. even if there were solid evidence that demons exist neither one of us would believe it so
My reply .....Of course I would believe it if there was solid evidence you wouldn’t wow! So you don’t accept solid evidence ?
You say ......I proved that god exist via my evolution intelligent design thing
My reply .....You’ve “proved “ nothing , not one creationist living has had a peer reviewed paper published that topples Evolution as what accepted as fact , appeals to the Bible are ridiculous to say the least.
You still don’t get it do you? If Evolution was demonstrated to be false how would it prove a god?
You say ....and we can see in our culture that demons probably exist
My reply ....I don’t believe in nonsense
satan makes people rich than haunts
you know on how almost all the haunted houses are big mansions. why is it always rich people and not poor people. i believe that this is because these houses once belonged to people who had sold there souls to Satan in exchange for wealth. but the wealth had a cost the demons hunt there houses**
Haunted houses! You believe in that nonsense? Also what about rich Christians do demons hunt them?
You say ......get it the wealth had a cost.
My reply .....Tell your wealthy preachers maybe?
You say .....the demon making people worship you thing. well were i use to live almost everyone was in the occult. though i can not prove that they made people worship them. people worship them. i don't expect you to watch all these videos im just simply showing you that people worship this stuff. if your were too you would have one fun weekend.
My reply ....I don’t watch nonsense
You say ....
scientist in the 1950 prescribed alcohol as medicine to treat morning sickness in the 1950s we found it was bad for pregnant people to drink in the 1970
My reply ....some scientists may have so what?
Christian plantation owners approved of slavery and used the Bible as justification so your point is?
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 71%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.98  
  Sources: 7  
  Relevant (Beta): 26%  
  Learn More About Debra
HOW does disproving evolution get you to jesus...?
  Considerate: 89%  
  Substantial: 27%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 70%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.82  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
why are you asking me ?
  Considerate: 78%  
  Substantial: 20%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.02  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
this is the definition of intelligence
The ability to acquire and apply knowledge and skills.
‘an eminent man of great intelligence’
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/intelligence
how god apply s knowledge
lets start with an easy one to understand the night owl and night vision this how it shows intelligence by apply knowledge
https://www.owlpages.com/owls/articles.php?a=5
and bananas have been selective breed a lot. and are far from what they use to be.
there are poisiond plants because god cursed the ground
Genesis 3:17 ESV / 8 helpful votes
And to Adam he said, “Because you have listened to the voice of your wife and have eaten of the tree of which I commanded you, ‘You shall not eat of it,’ cursed is the ground because of you; in pain you shall eat of it all the days of your life;https://www.openbible.info/topics/god_cursing_the_ground
  Considerate: 68%  
  Substantial: 90%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.28  
  Sources: 17  
  Relevant (Beta): 26%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 95%  
  Substantial: 8%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 0%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.8  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 80%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 24%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 85%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.62  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 51%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 94%  
  Substantial: 19%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 82%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.86  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 63%  
  Substantial: 78%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.44  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 53%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 84%  
  Substantial: 44%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 85%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.58  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 6%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 56%  
  Substantial: 27%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 82%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.18  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 56%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 86%  
  Substantial: 31%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 81%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.14  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 92%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 27%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.22  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 30%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 53%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 87%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.18  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 15%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 63%  
  Substantial: 85%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 87%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.92  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 79%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 86%  
  Substantial: 18%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 75%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 35%  
  Learn More About Debra
You can make whatever memes you want, but the laws of physics are not dependent on your sarcasm. Scientists do not "believe", we instead examine the evidence and develop theories that best fit that evidence.
It took Edison many years to develop a light bulb. The nature, however, did not have many years; it had many hundreds millions years to perfect its designs. It does not matter how much of a genius inventor you are; you are going to be hopelessly outnumbered on this one.
You also might want to, at least, use proper spelling of Edison's first name, if you really are going to pursue the meme-making career.
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 89%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.72  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 40%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.5  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 62%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 63%  
  Substantial: 27%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.68  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 85%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 75%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.8  
  Sources: 8  
  Relevant (Beta): 30%  
  Learn More About Debra
https://bioone.org/journals/Journal-of-Vertebrate-Paleontology/volume-34/issue-1/02724634.2013.793195/Dental-and-Tarsal-Anatomy-of-iMiacis-i-ilatouri-i-and/10.1080/02724634.2013.793195.full
A freshly killed cow is a cow resulting from millennia of cultivation of cows. In addition to the selective breeding, various chemicals are used nowadays for the cows to grow in a way that makes their meat more suitable for humans. And that is a good thing; that is the reason we no longer die to random diseases after eating a slab of meat, unlike our ancestors.
First, you should learn what a "proof" is. Something seeming reasonable to you is not a proof of anything. I can come up with a million random explanations of the observed phenomena. The question is: which explanations are supported by evidence, and which are a product of random guessing? And it so happens that your version belongs to the latter category, while the evolution theory belongs to the former one.
Something being effective does not indicate an intelligent design behind it; it is a preposterous notion. Sharp rocks are very effective at killing people who jump into them from the height of 5 kilometers, yet there is no reason to believe that someone intentionally placed those rocks there.
  Considerate: 63%  
  Substantial: 76%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.54  
  Sources: 8  
  Relevant (Beta): 21%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 54%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.08  
  Sources: 5  
  Relevant (Beta): 32%  
  Learn More About Debra
Religion is all bunk.
Religion is all bunk. I have never seen the slightest scientific proof of the religious ideas of heaven and hell, of future life for individuals, or of a personal God.
  Considerate: 65%  
  Substantial: 56%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.62  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 62%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 13%  
  Substantial: 81%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 75%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.7  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 80%  
  Substantial: 14%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 58%  
  Substantial: 88%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.68  
  Sources: 7  
  Relevant (Beta): 15%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 17%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 60%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.58  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 91%  
  Learn More About Debra
To believe in God i must see God, common sense.
We are completely ignorant on such matters, thats why the word Faith is used, to believe completely without evidence.
Faith equals ignorance.
  Considerate: 60%  
  Substantial: 40%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.24  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 84%  
  Substantial: 28%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 60%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 86%  
  Learn More About Debra
HOW SUPERIOR MIND JESUS did not know when the end would come?
.@crossed
  Considerate: 63%  
  Substantial: 40%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 75%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.58  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 48%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 78%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.34  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: piece of paper    money   Faith   gold  
  Relevant (Beta): 72%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 73%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.28  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: best way    physical form   Physical Relm   different Relm  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 78%  
  Substantial: 55%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.92  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: idea of evolution    higher intellience   person   nature  
  Relevant (Beta): 81%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 64%  
  Substantial: 17%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 75%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 1.78  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: book    Sand      
  Relevant (Beta): 58%  
  Learn More About Debra
@Sand
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 25%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 78%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.74  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: word faith    faith   EVIDENCE   evidence.If  
  Relevant (Beta): 78%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 61%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 85%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.54  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 37%  
  Learn More About Debra
https://www.britannica.com/list/7-animals-that-turn-white-in-winter
Examples so you can see my logic.
God created the weasel to turn white so that it can go with the white winter.
this is like if wearing a red shirt and decide to wear red pants to go with itor if a race car driver drives a green car so he decides to were green cloths so it goes with the green car.
or if I paint my house blue but i decide to also paint my mailbox blue to go with the blue houseor if God created the rabbits to turn brown to white during the winter so that it can go with the white snow
Or i have a white house so i color the fence around it white to go with the white house
the coloring is an intelligent choice and not an accident
god created the trees green to go with the green grass
just like if i wear a green shirt so i decide to wear green pants to go with it
Or i colored the lettering green to go with the subject about green
or if i wear red pants so i decide to wear a red shirt to go with it.
or how god created seasonal animals to turn white during the winter to go with the white snow.
or if a race car driver drives a red car so he wears a red uniform to go with it.
It took Edison many years to develop a light bulb. The nature, however, did not have many years; it had many hundreds millions years to perfect its designs. It does not matter how much of a genius inventor you are; you are going to be hopelessly outnumbered on this one.
i am not saying that that is good i am saying that all these thing
thank you so much
  Considerate: 55%  
  Substantial: 82%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.3  
  Sources: 12  
  Relevant (Beta): 20%  
  Learn More About Debra